01 / 06How it compares
How it compares By technology, never by company · every line sourced

Four other ways to read a heartbeat and a breath. Each one asks something of the patient.

A wearable has to be worn and charged. Short-wave radar has to be close, and works best on someone lying still and uncovered. An under-mattress pad has to carry the patient’s weight through the right mattress. This page sets out what each technology needs, where it does better than ours, and where it does not, using the regulators’ and manufacturers’ own documents.

WearablesWorn, charged, and on
60 GHz radarClose, to the side
120 GHz radarIn range, at rest
Under-mattress padsThe right mattress, the right weight
XK300 · 7.3 GHzNothing worn, through bedding, up to 7 m
XK300 vs wearables Rings, watches and patches

A wearable is excellent while it is on. The chart cannot tell when it is not.

5 days of readings25 days of a flat battery that looked exactly the same
One thirty-day window, as a cardiologist described it for a heart failure patient in her eighties who never took the watch off. One clinician’s account, not an average.

Worn, charged, and switched on

Every reading depends on the device being on the body with charge left. A flat battery produces no reading and, on most charts, no warning either. A sensor on the wall has no battery to run down.

Adherence falls over months

In a hypertension programme of 6,595 patients, people transmitted data on about 70 per cent of enrolled days. In a Medicaid diabetes programme, fewer than half transmitted on 80 per cent of days.

Smith et al., Healthcare, 2024 · Park et al., Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023

Breathing, inferred or measured

A wrist or finger device estimates breathing from small changes in the pulse. The XK300 reads the chest rising and keeps the breathing waveform. We could not find a published validation of ring breathing rate against a clinical reference.

Why it is different from a wearable: breathing rhythm and Heartbeat Clarity, explained. Heartbeat Clarity is investigational.

Where a wearable wins

Anything away from the bed: daytime heart rate, heart-rate variability, activity, skin temperature, sleep staging, and a short acute episode where a five-day patch is the right tool. The XK300 does not measure HRV and does not stage sleep.

Where the XK300 wins

Weeks and months with no action from the patient: breathing measured from the chest, resting heart rate with nothing worn, bed presence and motion, and a gap in data that is visible the same night rather than thirty days later.

The full ring comparison, measurement by measurement, is on the science page.

XK300 vs 60 GHz and 120 GHz radar Physics, then the filings

Radar is not one thing. Wavelength decides what it can see through.

Contactless vital-sign radar has been cleared at several frequencies. The higher the frequency, the shorter the wave. The XK300 works at about 7.3 GHz. Two common alternatives work at about 60 GHz and at about 122 GHz.

About 122 GHz · one wave ≈ 2.5 mm About 60 GHz · one wave ≈ 5 mm About 7.3 GHz, XK300 · one wave ≈ 41 mm to scale, bar = one wavelength × 10
Wavelength is the speed of light divided by frequency. A wave a few millimetres long reflects from the first soft surface it meets: a blanket, a pillow, a fold of clothing. A wave about four centimetres long carries through bedding and clothing to the chest underneath.

Through bedding

Breathing has to be read from the chest. At 122 GHz the wave does not get through a duvet; at 60 GHz it is degraded. At 7.3 GHz it passes through the way Wi-Fi passes through a wall.

Through a change of position

The shorter the wave, the more a small change in what it reflects from matters. When a patient rolls onto their side, a millimetre-wave return can change completely and the reading has to be found again. A 41 mm wave changes far less.

Through a housing

Where the sensor has to sit behind a protective enclosure or a ceiling tile, a longer wave carries through material that stops a millimetre wave.

What the filings say Quoted from cleared devices’ own FDA summaries

Distance and posture, in their own words.

XK300 detection area, within 7 m (not to scale) 60 GHz: 1.0 m or less, to the side of the patient

“… should be positioned 1.0 meter (3.0 feet) or less”

A cleared 60 GHz device’s FDA summary, on placement to the side of the patient

“… RR and HR while the patient is in its detection range at rest.”

A cleared 122 GHz device’s FDA summary

“XK300 monitors presence or absence of a patient in a detection area of within 7 meters.”

XK300 FDA summary, K202464. It reads patients on their back or their side.

Resting matters to every contactless sensor, ours included: the XK300 reads heart rate and breathing when the person has been still. The difference is how close, and how uncovered, the patient has to be.

Where short-wave radar wins

Very fine resolution at close range, and small, low-cost chips. For a sensor on a bedside table pointed at an uncovered chest, a millimetre wave can do very well.

Where the XK300 wins

Distance, bedding and posture: a detection area of up to 7 metres, readings through a duvet, and placement on the wall, the ceiling, behind a panel or under the mattress.

XK300 vs under-mattress pads Ballistocardiography: air bladders and piezo sensors

An under-mattress pad reads the bed. So the bed decides what it reads.

Each heartbeat and breath gives the body a tiny push. An under-mattress pad feels that push after it has travelled through the patient, the sheet, any topper and the mattress. Counting beats and breaths survives that journey well. Everything the mattress does to the push, it also does to the reading.

Under-mattress pad
Patient
Sheet, topper, winter bedding
Mattress: foam, spring, air or water
Pad carries the weight ↓ reads force
Bed base

The signal is a force that has passed through every layer. The mattress type, its thickness, a second person and the patient’s weight all change it.

XK300
Patient: chest wall moving
Sheet and bedding: radio passes through
Foam mattress
Essence lies on the deck, or the sensor sits on the wall
Bed base

The signal is the chest wall’s own motion, read by a radio pulse. Nothing in the sensor carries the patient’s weight.

Air mattresses

A US Veterans Affairs assessment reported that an under-mattress system tended to “double read” heart rate from air-mattress vibration, and could not read patients on air mattresses.

VA technology assessment, 2016
Lying on their side

The same assessment reported that, in some instances, vital signs could not be read for patients positioned on their sides.

VA technology assessment, 2016
Mattress type and thickness

One manufacturer’s instructions say not to use its pad with waterbeds, air beds or mechanically articulated mattresses; its support pages describe testing on mattresses 10 to 40 cm thick.

Manufacturer instructions for use and support documentation
Weight limits

FDA documents for under-mattress systems describe accuracy studied in adults under 111 kg, and an indication for adults up to 350 lb (159 kg). The XK300 has no weight limit, and patient weight does not affect its reading.

FDA 510(k) summaries
A second person

At least one manufacturer tells users to ignore the data when someone other than the main user lies on the pad.

Manufacturer instructions for use
Where the pad sits

An air mat has to lie under the chest. One system’s staff manual explains that if the mat is too far towards the feet, a resident in bed can show no heart or breathing reading and be marked as out of bed.

Manufacturer staff manual
Care aid or medical device

Some under-mattress systems are sold as care aids. One maker’s brochure states its product is not designed or made for use in life-threatening situations.

Manufacturer brochure, 2026
Alerts in practice

A care home presenting its experience reported sensors sounding frequently because of sensitivity settings, and a fall that was worked out from the graphs the next day.

Care-home conference presentation, Japan
Parts that carry load

A hospital under-mattress sensor was documented as needing replacement every year; a consumer air pad lists an expected product life of three years.

NICE medtech innovation briefing, 2016 · VA 2016 · manufacturer instructions
Read from the chest Read through a mattress
Illustration, not a recording. Beats can be counted in both. The mattress acts like a spring and damper, so the shape of each beat is smoothed on the way to the pad. The XK300 reads the motion directly; under-mattress research also extracts waveform features, with the mattress in the path.
Where an under-mattress pad wins

Low cost at consumer scale, very simple to set up at home, no view of the room, and good published breathing-rate accuracy in older adults on a suitable mattress.

Where the XK300 wins

No load-bearing sensing part. Reads a patient on their back or side, at any weight, through a foam mattress of any thickness, and can move to the wall or ceiling when nothing may go under the bed.

Radar has limits too

Radio does not pass through water or coil springs. On a waterbed or an innerspring mattress, the unit goes on top of the mattress beneath a foam topper, or on the wall. Hospital beds mostly use foam mattresses; some homes will need the topper or the wall.

No study has yet compared radar and under-mattress heart-rate accuracy head to head in hospital patients, and none has followed either technology’s accuracy over months. We do not claim otherwise.

Side by side What each technology asks of the patient and the room

One table. Read it for your setting, not ours.

Wearables60 GHz radar122 GHz radarUnder-mattress padsXK300 · 7.3 GHz
Anything worn or chargedYesNoNoNoNo
How breathing is obtainedEstimated from the pulseChest motionChest motionForce through the mattressChest motion, waveform kept
Distance stated in a filingOn the body1.0 m or less, to the sideIn range, at restUnder the patientDetection area within 7 m
PostureAnySensitive to position changesVery sensitive to position changesSide-lying reported as a problemReads on the back or side
BeddingNot relevantDegraded through a duvetDoes not pass through a duvetPart of the signal pathReads through bedding
Mattress typeNot relevantNot relevantNot relevantExclusions stated, e.g. air, water, articulated; tested thickness rangeAny thickness; not through water or coil springs
Weight limit in labellingSizingUnder 111 kg studied; up to 350 lb indicatedNone; weight does not affect the reading
Part that carries load or wearsBattery, strap, adhesiveNoneNonePad or sensor; replacement documentedNone
Away from the bedYes, all dayClose range onlyClose range onlyNoRoom presence and motion; vital signs at rest

“—” means the documents we reviewed do not state it. Entries describe technology categories from regulators’ and manufacturers’ published documents, not any single product, and products within a category differ. Ask us for the full references and 510(k) numbers.

What every sensor shares Including ours

No contactless sensor is an alarm. Ask any vendor for the number.

Informs, does not alert

No contactless vital-sign device of any make, the XK300 included, is FDA-cleared as an alarm or for active patient monitoring. Every one of them informs care.

At rest

Heart rate and breathing are read when the person is still, by every contactless technology on this page. Movement is measured; vital signs wait for stillness.

One question checks any claim

Ask for the 510(k) number. FDA clearance numbers are public by design, so any claim is checkable in a minute. XK300: K202464.